Comments on: Claims VU’s maths cut doesn’t add up

By: Dr M M Arif Rafiq

Dr M M Arif Rafiq — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:28:17 +0000

I am very sorry to say about:

What is happing around?

RGMIA is a reputed platform and all Journals related to the field of inequalities are very well reputed. I will just talk about work from Pakistan. Including my self all of my colleagues belong to Pakistan are thankful to RGMIA for giving us the opportunity to work with them on this important field. Moreover very reputed people like Sir S P Singh, Sir V LK, Sir Th M Raissias, Sir Lj B Ciric, Sir Cho, Sir Ravi P Agarwal, Sir Pecaric, , Sir B S Lee, Sir Aslam Noor and many other honorable names (I doubt if the list is complete) are associated with this group.

From 2002, I am reading and working about the field of inequalities and it is Prof. Dragomir who provided us the valuable literature through RGMIA which was never possible before this, specifically for Countries belong to third world.

Finally I hope that, this kind of nonsense and stupid activities should be stopped.

My Best Regards

Dr M M Arif Rafiq

Dept. of Mathematics

COMSATS, Lahore, Pakistan

By: Smorg

Smorg — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:38:27 +0000

Hmmm. I’m smelling a rat. All of the sudden a seemingly concerted opposition to this journal show up and try to flood the comment session with accusation of the journal’s inferiority. That sound pretty political to me….

By: Liu Chen

Liu Chen — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:38:13 +0000

papers published for inequalities are wrong and third class, specifically from Australia, Romania, Crotia, pakistan, China.

By: Lin Yi

Lin Yi — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:19:03 +0000

I found many mistakes apperaed in the papers of inequalities.

By: M Abid

M Abid — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:41:08 +0000

JIPAM is a third class journal, and this should be stoped now. Overall there is a list of papers of Dragomir in JIPAM and RIGMIA .

By: Ram Kapoor

Ram Kapoor — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 07:37:04 +0000

I stongly agreed with the views of Jain and Zing. The point of views of People like Cho, Farooq, etc. are not correct. I found many basic mistakes in the papers of this field and in Dragomir papers.

By: Zian Zingh

Zian Zingh — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:32:25 +0000

The RGMIA has very prro research and publishing existing results in the journal with minor modifications. Please, cut the wing of RGMIA and reduce their staff strength at earliest… Prof. Dragomir is the biggest fraud. How one can publish 20/30 papers in a year ??? Stupid community !!!!

By: Nimit jain

Nimit jain — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:28:10 +0000

RGMIA has worst type of research. These old professors have very good connections with USA faculties like R.N. Mohapatra. The paper standard in this journal is very poor. It is better to stop funding RGMIA and please reduce the staff in Mathematics at VU. Thanks to the Australian Goverment…..

By: Yeol Je Cho

Yeol Je Cho — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 05:14:38 +0000

I strongly support RGMIA staff. Further, the papers published by RGMIA are very interesting and useful.
Now RGMIA has contribute very much to development of Mathematics.

I am sure that RGMIA will be one of the best Research Groups for Mathematics very soon.

By: interpreter

interpreter — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:49:01 +0000

Casual teachers can bring a wealth of real world experience and are not necessarily bad. However, I believe that a committed knowledgeable full timer is better. VU still has some way to go about understanding the priorities for budgeting, but I hope they work it through.